Technical PaperApril 2026

AQAL: A Foundation Model Approach to Predicting Neurodiverse Brain Activity

Leeza Care Research & Development Foundation

Abstract

We present AQAL, a computational system that predicts how neurodiverse (autistic) brains process sensory stimuli by combining a proprietary multimodal brain encoding model (177M parameters) with a statistical neurodiverse transform derived from 871 resting-state fMRI scans from a large-scale multi-site autism neuroimaging consortium. AQAL maps text, audio, and video inputs onto 20,484 cortical surface vertices and generates both neurotypical and neurodiverse brain activation predictions in real time. Our connectivity analysis identifies 820 statistically significant inter-regional differences (p < 0.05) between ASD and typically-developing groups across 100 cortical parcels, with the limbic temporal pole, default mode network, and visual cortex showing the largest effect sizes. We further introduce a sensory profiling module that quantifies divergence across seven canonical brain networks, enabling practical applications in accessibility auditing and personalized accommodation design.

neurodiversityautismbrain encodingfMRIfoundation modelsensory processingcortical mapping

Contents

1.Introduction

Autism spectrum conditions affect approximately 1 in 36 children worldwide (CDC, 2023). Understanding how autistic brains process sensory information differently from neurotypical brains is critical for designing inclusive environments, educational strategies, and clinical interventions. However, functional neuroimaging studies are expensive, slow, and inaccessible to most practitioners and families.

Recent advances in brain encoding models — neural networks trained to predict brain activity from sensory stimuli — offer a new paradigm. State-of-the-art multimodal transformers can now predict cortical surface activity from vision, audition, and language inputs with meaningful accuracy across subjects.

We asked: Can a brain encoding model, combined with population-level connectivity data from autism neuroimaging, predict how a neurodiverse brain would respond to arbitrary stimuli?

AQAL is our answer. Rather than requiring individual brain scans, AQAL uses a proprietary statistical transform trained on a large multi-site fMRI corpus to convert neurotypical brain predictions into neurodiverse variants, making neuroscience-informed predictions accessible through a web API.

1.1 Contributions

  1. A CPU-based statistical transform that converts neurotypical predictions to neurodiverse predictions using connectivity effect sizes from 871 subjects across 20 clinical sites.
  2. A connectivity analysis pipeline identifying 820 significant inter-regional differences between ASD and TD groups across 4,950 tested connections.
  3. A sensory profiling system that maps brain-level divergence onto seven functional networks (visual, auditory, motor, language, social, default mode, salience).
  4. A publicly accessible platform (API + web interface) enabling real-time neurodiverse brain prediction from text, audio, or video input.

3.Methods

3.1 System Architecture

Stimulus (text / audio / video)
        │
        ▼
┌───────────────────────┐
│   Feature Extraction  │  Proprietary multimodal encoders
└──────────┬────────────┘
           │
           ▼
┌───────────────────────┐
│   AQAL Brain Encoder  │  8-layer transformer, 177M params
│   (NT Prediction)     │  → 20,484 vertices × T timesteps
└──────────┬────────────┘
           │
           ▼
┌───────────────────────┐
│   ND Transform        │  Trained on 871 multi-site subjects
│   (ASD Prediction)    │  Per-vertex scale + shift
└──────────┬────────────┘
           │
           ▼
┌───────────────────────┐
│   Analysis &          │  Divergence metrics, sensory profile,
│   Visualization       │  connectivity mapping, interpretation
└───────────────────────┘

3.2 AQAL Brain Encoder

The AQAL brain encoder is a proprietary multimodal transformer trained to predict cortical surface activity from sensory inputs. The model architecture consists of:

  • Feature extractors: Dedicated encoders for text (6 layers), video (2 layers), and audio (2 layers) built on state-of-the-art foundation models
  • Feature projectors: Per-modality MLPs mapping to a common hidden dimension of 1,152
  • Temporal smoothing: Gaussian kernel (size 9) for hemodynamic response alignment
  • Transformer encoder: 8 layers, 18 heads, head dimension 64, FF dimension 3,072
  • Subject layers: Low-rank output adaptation (bottleneck 2,048) with 0.1 dropout
  • Output space: 20,484 vertices on a standard cortical surface mesh (10,242 per hemisphere)

The model operates at 2 Hz temporal resolution. Modality dropout of 0.3 enables predictions from any subset of input modalities.

3.3 Training Dataset

We trained the neurodiverse transform on a large-scale multi-site autism neuroimaging corpus comprising 871 resting-state fMRI scans:

GroupNSites
ASD40320
TD46820

All scans were preprocessed using a standard fMRI preprocessing pipeline with band-pass filtering (0.01–0.1 Hz) and no global signal regression. We extracted mean timeseries from 100 cortical parcels using a validated cortical parcellation, computed Pearson correlation matrices, and applied Fisher's z-transform for variance stabilization, producing 4,950 unique connectivity features per subject.

3.4 Statistical Group Comparison

For each of the 4,950 unique connectivity pairs, we performed an independent-samples t-test comparing ASD and TD groups. 820 of 4,950 connections (16.6%) were significant at p < 0.05.

The most affected regions ranked by normalized effect size:

RankRegionNetworkEffect
1Limbic Temporal Pole RLimbic1.000
2Limbic Temporal Pole LLimbic0.857
3Visual 9 LVisual0.551
4Default Mode Temporal 2 RDefault Mode0.549
5Default Mode Temporal 2 LDefault Mode0.527

These findings are consistent with the autism neuroimaging literature, which identifies limbic hyperconnectivity and default mode network alterations as hallmarks of ASD (Hull et al., 2017).

3.5 Neurodiverse Transform

We derive a proprietary per-vertex transform that converts neurotypical predictions to neurodiverse predictions. For each of 20,484 cortical vertices v:

  1. Identify the cortical ROI r(v) to which vertex v belongs.
  2. Compute the normalized effect size er for that ROI from connectivity t-tests.
  3. Compute scale and shift factors using a proprietary mapping function.
  4. Apply: &ycirc;vND = &ycirc;vNT × scalev + shiftv

Of 20,484 vertices, 18,067 (88.3%) are affected by the transform, reflecting the widespread but heterogeneous nature of connectivity differences in autism.

3.6 Sensory Profiling

We map vertex-level divergence between NT and ND predictions onto seven canonical functional brain networks:

NetworkFunctionBrain Areas
VisualProcessing sightPrimary and secondary visual cortex
AuditoryProcessing soundAuditory cortex, belt regions
LanguageSpeech and wordsBroca's and Wernicke's areas
MotorMovement and bodyPrimary motor and somatosensory cortex
SocialUnderstanding othersSuperior temporal regions
Default ModeSelf-reflectionPosterior cingulate, medial prefrontal
SalienceFiltering what mattersInsula, anterior cingulate

Scores are normalized to [0, 1] by dividing by the maximum network divergence, providing an interpretable summary of which processing domains are most differently activated.

3.7 Infrastructure

ComponentTechnology
Brain modelAQAL Encoder (proprietary, PyTorch)
API serverCloud VM (8 cores, 32 GB RAM)
FrontendNext.js on Vercel
InterpretationLLM-powered (GPT)

All inference runs on CPU. No GPU is required.

4.Results

4.1 Connectivity Analysis

Analysis of 871 subjects across 20 clinical sites revealed 820 significant connections out of 4,950 tested (16.6%, p < 0.05). The limbic system showed the largest effect sizes, consistent with known emotional regulation differences. Default mode network showed bilateral temporal alterations. Visual cortex alterations align with documented sensory processing variations.

4.2 Network-Level Differences

NetworkDifferenceDirection
LimbicHighestHyperconnectivity
Default ModeHighAltered connectivity
VisualModerate–HighModified processing
SalienceModerateAltered filtering
Dorsal AttentionModerateShifted focus
ControlLow–ModerateMild executive differences
SomatomotorLow–ModerateSubtle motor differences

4.3 Transform Coverage

The neurodiverse transform affects 18,067 of 20,484 cortical vertices (88.3%), with scale factors ranging from 0.85 to 1.15 and shift factors from \u22120.05 to 0.01. The transform is denser in temporal and limbic regions and sparser in primary motor cortex, matching the known neuroanatomy of autism.

4.4 Real-Time Performance

OperationLatency
Text → events (TTS + ASR)~3–5s
AQAL encoder inference (10 timesteps)~8–15s
ND transform application< 100ms
Surface rendering (4 views × 10 steps)~5–8s
Total end-to-end~20–30s

5.Applications

5.1 Sensory Accessibility Auditing

AQAL can process video of physical spaces (classrooms, offices, retail environments) and generate second-by-second sensory stress predictions for neurodiverse individuals, including flagged high-stress moments and actionable accessibility recommendations.

5.2 Educational Accommodation Design

By profiling how specific educational content differently activates neurodiverse brain networks, AQAL can inform content pacing, optimal break timing, and modality-specific accommodations.

5.3 Clinical Communication

The sensory profile output provides a quantitative, brain-data-grounded framework for communicating how a neurodiverse individual might experience specific stimuli — replacing subjective descriptions with measurable network-level predictions.

6.Limitations

  1. No GPU fine-tuning. The neurodiverse transform is a statistical approximation, not a directly fine-tuned neural network. GPU fine-tuning on neurodiverse fMRI data would likely improve accuracy but was not feasible due to compute constraints.
  2. Indirect mapping. The transform maps connectivity-level group differences onto vertex-level predictions. This assumes resting-state connectivity differences generalize to task-evoked activity — a reasonable but imperfect assumption.
  3. Group-level, not individual. AQAL produces an average neurodiverse prediction. Autism is a spectrum, and individual variation is substantial.
  4. Uncorrected p-values. The 820 significant connections are reported at p < 0.05 without multiple comparison correction. With FDR correction, the number decreases.
  5. Dataset limitations. The training corpus is heterogeneous (20 sites, varying protocols) and skewed toward males. Results may not generalize equally to all populations.

7.Future Work

  • GPU fine-tuning of the AQAL encoder directly on neurodiverse fMRI data
  • Individual calibration via a 5-minute sensory assessment to personalize predictions
  • Expanded training data from additional consortia to reach 10,000+ subjects
  • Additional neurodivergent conditions (ADHD, sensory processing disorder, anxiety)
  • EEG integration for real-time, portable brain monitoring
  • Clinical validation studies comparing AQAL predictions against observed behavioral responses

8.Conclusion

AQAL demonstrates that combining a state-of-the-art multimodal brain encoding model with population-level autism neuroimaging data can produce meaningful neurodiverse brain predictions from arbitrary sensory stimuli. While the current statistical transform is an approximation, it makes neuroscience-informed predictions accessible without requiring individual brain scans or GPU infrastructure. The identification of 820 significant connectivity differences across 871 subjects provides a robust empirical foundation, and the system's real-time performance enables practical applications in accessibility, education, and clinical communication.

By releasing the platform publicly, we aim to make computational neurodiversity research accessible to researchers, educators, clinicians, and families who lack access to neuroimaging facilities.

References

CDC. (2023). Autism Spectrum Disorder: Data & Statistics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

de Heer, W. A., Huth, A. G., Griffiths, T. L., Gallant, J. L., & Theunissen, F. E. (2017). The hierarchical cortical organization of human speech processing. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(27), 6539–6557.

Holiga, S., et al. (2019). Patients with autism spectrum disorders display reproducible functional connectivity alterations. Science Translational Medicine, 11(481).

Hull, J. V., et al. (2017). Resting-state functional connectivity in autism spectrum disorders: A review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7, 205.

Huth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature, 532(7600), 453–458.

Ortega Caro, J., et al. (2023). BrainLM: A Foundation Model for Brain Activity Recordings. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00656.

Thomas, A. W., et al. (2023). Self-supervised learning of brain dynamics from broad neuroimaging data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36.

Appendix A: Model Parameters

ParameterValue
Total parameters177M
Hidden dimension1,152
Transformer layers8
Attention heads18
Head dimension64
Feedforward dimension3,072
Output vertices20,484
Temporal resolution2 Hz
Low-rank bottleneck2,048
Modality dropout0.3
Subject dropout0.1

Appendix B: Training Corpus Demographics

MetricASDTD
N403468
Mean age16.9 ± 7.816.6 ± 7.0
Male (%)86.684.2
Sites2020

Appendix C: System Availability

ResourceURL
Landing pagemind.new
NeuroBrainneuro.mind.new
Sensory Auditsensory.mind.new